Path: rQ!rQdQ!remarQ73!supernews.com!remarQ.com!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.cwix.com!193.190.198.38!news.belnet.be!newsgate.cistron.nl!het.net!newshub.bart.net!news.bart.net!news.bart.net!not-for-mail
From: Helena Kobrin <anonymous@nym.cypherpunks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,alt.scientology
Subject: NOTs part 7
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:25:24 -0500
Organization: bART Internet Services
Lines: 502
Message-ID: <36E44044.7E5F8C1@nym.cypherpunks.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mickey.2005.bart.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: freyja.bart.nl 920906436 19163 194.158.161.8 (8 Mar 1999 15:20:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bart.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 15:20:36 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: rQ alt.religion.scientology:548489 alt.clearing.technology:68704

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                   HCO BULLETIN OF 31 JANUARY 1980 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 51

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                                      AUDIT BTs CONCEPTUALLY 


            


      (References:

      HCOB 26 Sep 78 I        WORD CLEARING AND INFORMATION FOR
                              PRE-PTS ON NED FOR OTs

      HCOB 12 Jan 80          ACKNOWLEDGING THE "ME" ANSWER
      HCOB 27 Oct 79          VALENCE TECHNIQUE ADDITION
      HCOB 17 Sep 78 I        VALENCES.)



            (This HCOB adds to HCOB 26 Sep 78, Issue I, WORD CLEARING
AND INFORMATION FOR PRE-OTs
      ON NED FOR OTS, and is to be used in the indoctrination of Pre-OTs
on NED for OTs.) 



            When a Pre-OT looks at a BT and gets too laggardly,the BT
often turns on a picture. The NOTs Pre-OT
      could think this picture was the What. It never is. The Whate BT
is simpIy making a picture. Answers come
      through as concepts, not pictures. 

            The rule is: THE PRE-OT IGNORES THE PICTURE AND DOES THE
ACTION IN CONCEPTS. 

            In NOTs one is not dealing with pictures, one is dealing
with the basic of pictures. Pctures are a red
      herring - wrong target. 


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER


      LRH:dm:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1978
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 




                    

      LIMITED
      DISTRIBUTION
      ACS Auditors
      ACS C/Ses 
                                  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                     HCO BULLETIN OF 24 MAY 1980 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 52

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                                        URGENT - IMPORTANT
                                     NOTs WHAT/WHO L & N STEP 


            (References:
      HCOB 27 Oct 79, NOTs Series 47, VALENCE TECHNIQUE ADDITION
      HCOB 12 Jan 80, NOTs Series 49, ACKNOWLEDGING THE ME ANSWER.) 

            (This HCOB contains important revisions and additional
instructions regarding the NOTS What/Who L
      & N Step, and modifies NOTs Series 47 and 49. It does not other-
wise cancel or change the rest of the
      NOTs Valence Technique, nor does it change the rest of the NOTs
procedures or Rundown. This issue must
      be thoroughly word cleared and star-rated along with the
referenced issues by NOT auditors and C/Ses to
      qualify them to use the NOTs What/Who L & N Step.) 

      THE RIGHT ITEM, ON THE WHAT L & N STEP 

            In NOTs Series 47 and 49 it is stated that you take "the
first reading item" (regardless of its read). In
      experience I have found this not always to be true. One can get
some small falls on several items before the
      real item is hit. Sometimes it requires an ack to get an F/N, but
the real item always F/Ns. 

            (E-meter Note: If one were to use other than an operational
Mark VI, one could be mislead by the meter. I
      have noticed that what is a small fall (sF) on an operational Mark
VI, is a fall (F) on another meter. This is not
      good, as the auditor seeing a fall F), could think he has the
item, when it is really a small fall. The
      exaggerated read makes one think wrong items have read when these
only gave a small fall. Also, the Mark
      V tends to just F/N, and gives on the problem of trying to read
through an F/N. The Mark V is not sensitive
      enough. Thus it is essential that an operational Mark VI is used.
The sizes of reads referred to here are at the
      correct Sensitivity setting of one third dial drop on can squeeze
per EM-5R. The Sensitivity must not be
      higher than this during the What/Who L & N Steps.) 

            The statements in NOTs Series 47 and 49 under Step 3
(Acknowledgement) are correct and the only
      change here is in the statement that you take "the first reading
item", plus a clarification of size of read. 

            The right What? L & N Step reads are a lot of small falls
preceding the right item. THE REAL ITEM
      ALWAYS F/Ns (even if it sometimes requires an ack to get it to
F/N). 

      THE "WHO" STEP 

            (Early in the NOTs Rundown, and sometimes later in the
Rundown, the being blows easily. Often before
      all the Valence Technique steps have been done, frequently blowing
on inspection. There is the
      phenomenon (described in earlier NOTs issues) of the cyclic aspect
of handling more difficult-to-blow BTs
      and clusters, followed by a series of easy/rapid blows. Later in
the Rundown, after the more available and
      easier-to-blow BTs and clusters have gone, those remaining tend to
be in worse shape as beings. You are
      then more frequently going to encounter the following phenomenon.) 

            The being seldom gets much of a read and seldom a blow on
the first right answer to the Who? question.
      It gives an answer, the right answer ("Me"), in many cases and
there's no real read. What one does then is
      ack encouragingly and asks it to repeat the answer ("Me"). Thus
encouraged, a BD F/N and blow on the
      repeated answer occurs. 

      PIN-POINTING ATTENTION 

            It is essential that the NOTs PreOT limits his/her attention
to the BT/cluster being addressed. You can
      get a mish-mash if their attention goes onto something else. I
have developed TR 8-Q (HCOB 22 Apr 80)
      which is an exercise in pin-pointing attention as well as asking a
question. Requiring a NOTs PreOT to do
      TR 8-Q will remedy this. 

      REPAIR LISTS FOR L & N 

            There are two repair lists for L & N errors that are shorter
than the L4BRA, and both of these can be used
      in NOTs. They are: HCOB 23 Sep 68 "Violation of the Laws of
Listing and Nulling", and HCOB 29 Sep 68
      "List Correction" (Tech Vol XI, pages 44, 45), and either of these
may be used, resorting to the longer
      L4BRA when necessary. The usual thing to do though would be to
recognize what was wrong from the
      reads noted in W/Ss (or lack of F/N on the What? item), and handle
accordingly and as given in earlier
      NOTs issues. 

      FES-ING 

            FESers and C/Ses must know the materials given in NOTs
Series 47, 49 and this issue and must inspect
      worksheets to see whether correct (or wrong) items have been
found, and whether the BT or cluster was
      blown. C/Ses must do this on every session, and FESers when they
are looking for errors on a case. Any
      previous instances of failure to get the right item, or failure to
handle a being to a blow can then be taken up
      in subsequent sessions and properly handled as described in this
issue. If the BT/cluster is still around it
      will read when the PreOT's attention is directed to that position
(area) and oriented to the item given in that
      session. (Remember that it now may be Suppressed or Invalidated,
and that the being probably has a Wrong
      Item and an Incomplete List.) If the error can be found and
corrected immediately, do so (such as simply
      completing the list to correct item, and completing the steps on
that being to blow), or, do one of the L & N
      Repair assessments to find what is wrong and then correct it and
handle the being to blow. 

      AUDITOR AND C/S QUALIFICATIONS 

            The requirements for an auditor or C/S to use this NOTs L &
N technique as given in NOTs Series 47 and
      49 are very important and it is a High Crime to violate these.
ONLY auditors and C/Ses who can L & N
      successfully may be permitted to use this technique, and then only
after they have completed the stated
      requirements in NOTs 47, 49, the referenced materials and this
issue. Until then, they may only use the other
      NOTs techniques, but not the L & N Step. 

      PROGRAMMING THE WHAT/WHO L & N STEP 

            Note that in NOTs SerieS 47, page 3, under "Warning" it is
stated: "...it will be necessary to use this
      technique of listing for the item, at some point on any case being
audited on NED for OTs,...". PreOTs being
      started on NOTs should not be put onto this technique at the
beginning of the NOTs Advance Program, no
      until the PreOT is well advanced through the Program. The other
NOTs techniques are fully adequate and
      very successful and most of the NOTs 26R Program can be done
before resorting to the NOTs L & N
      technique. 

            Only shift to the L & N procedure when the PreOT is well
advanced through the Program and encounters
      the phenomenon described in NOTs 47, page 1. Early in the NOTs
Program the case is fat with charge that
      will slough off easily and with the use of NOTs techniques other
than the listing technique given in NOTs
      Series 47. On a case that has been prematurely started on the L &
N Step, prefer to use the earlier NOTs
      techniques and do not overwork the L & N Step until the case is
ready for it, (this doesn't mean that one
      would stop the L & N technique altogether on such a case). 

            When the case is ready for the NOTs What/Who L & N Step, and
provided the auditor and C/S are
      qualified to run it, then the case is indoctrinated on the
procedure and begun (per NOTs 47, 49 and this
      issue). If all the NOTs auditors and C/Ses are not fully
qualified, then the PreOT could be reassigned when
      ready for the L & N Step. 

            In general most cases will follow the steps as laid out on
NOTs 26R and 27, as this is the
      research/developmental sequence of NOTs and most cases will follow
the same sequence and pattern and
      phenomena. 

            NOTs trainees should also follow this same sequence and only
train on the later techniques after they
      have had experience and wins on auditing the earlier NOTs Program
steps with the earlier techniques. Those
      are very easy to do, very rewarding and will enable the new NOTs
auditor to gain familiarity and confidence.


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER

                                       as assisted by
                                       Senior C/S Int 


      LRH:dm:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1978
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 




                    

      LIMITED
      DISTRIBUTION
      Advanced Courses
      Specialist
      Checksheet
      ACS Auditors
      ACS C/Ses 
                                  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                   HCO BULLETIN OF 14 FEBRUARY 1981 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 54

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                               CLARIFICATION ON ACKNOWLEDGING IN THE
                                        VALENCE TECHNIQUE 


      (Ref: NOTs Series 7, VALENCES) 

            It is very important that you have the Pre-OT acknowledge
the answer the BT or cluster gives to the
      "What are you?" question (see NOTs Series 7). Even if you got an
F/N on the answer, you still acknowledge
      and you will broaden the F/N. 

            We ask "Who are you?" to he same spot and we don't feed them
the answer. They sometimes comm lag,
      (don't get impatient with the comm lag), sometimes it's a few
seconds comm lag, and then you get the
      answer. You may have to repeat the question (see NOTs Series 7).
The "Me" answer will normally LFBD,
      and if that LFBD isn't very marked, you make sure you do the next
step of acknowledging the "Me" answer.
      In any event you could still acknowledge, but if the LFBD was
pronounced the probability is that he's gone.
      The auditor having the Pre-OT acknowledge the "Me" answer can
guarantee a blow. Now is this
      acknowledgement produces another read then we know it guaranteed a
blow. Sometimes you get another
      LFBD on the acknowledgement step, and sometimes you get a
broadening of the F/N. 

      CAUTIONS 

            Sometimes, quite often in fact, this short-circuits. You
ask: "What are you?" and the guy says "Me" and
      blows. And sometimes you are patiently trying to go through all
these steps and you get a series of blows.
      A blow or a series of blows can occur at any ime during NOTs. You
don't then continue the steps of this
      Technique, as that BT or cluster has gone! Sometimes a series of
blows or an automatic blow will go into a
      Persistant F/N or a Floating Tone Arm and in either instance you
would end off the session. 

            Also you can get repetitive blows if a case is running
pretty clean, and you can get blows without BDs.
      There isn't much left on the charge and it isn't registering on
the meter to amount to anything. 

            On "Hello and OK" you sometimes get a blow. The BT or
cluster doesn't answer up and run "Hellos and
      OKs" repetitively to get it into comm. Rarely, it will suddenly
blow, and it would then be senseless to go on
      trying to run "Hello and OK", or anything else, as that one has
gone. 

            Some auditors have been known to ask a pc if it blew, during
the Valence Technique steps. Even nag the
      Pre-OT, "Did it blow?", "Has it gone?", "Still around?". This
could be due to the auditor's unfamiliarity with
      his meter, and not recognizing a blow when he sees it occur on the
meter. Or, possibly some may have
      confused another technique, Date/Locate, with this technique. You
of course always Date to blow, and
      Locate to blow, and the auditor could get the idea that he should
carry over Date/Locate technique into
      Valence Technique. 

            It is very poor practice to ask the Pre-OT if it blew during
NOTs Valence Technique. You could cause the
      BT or cluster to submerge or be suppressed, or you could
invalidate a blow that did occur. 

            This doesn't mean that you can't ever ask if it blew. You
could ask if it is "still around?" and a read would
      confirm that it is. But this type of question is asking for a
missingness . It is no longer there. There's a large
      percentage of pcs that never see the blow, and it isn't something
to see, because it's a missingness. This
      type of question can be difficult for the Pre-OT to answer as
there is now nothing there for him to perceive
      as it has gone. If the meter BD'd and F/Ned on the "Me" step, it
would be idiocy to then ask if it blew, of
      course it did! But if your meter didn't tell you it blew, you
could be in a quandary and have to solve that
      problem. But you wouldn't interrupt the Valence Technique to ask
if it blew, and you wouldn't get into
      nagging the Pre-OT. You just follow on through with your steps,
and particularly if you had the Pre-OT ack
      the "Me" answer, then you got your blow alright. So this concern
about whether the BT blew is misplaced. 

            These points are stated so that the auditor will understand
what he is doing, why he is doing it, and what
      manifestations he can expect to occur, because these
manifestations will occur. This technique is a very
      positive series of steps, and they go in that sequence. If these
steps are done as given, you will get the
      result, and if departed from or if there is an error, you can
definitely expect to get that manifestation too, i.e.
      too broad an attention span and you will get restim. 

            It is necessary that the auditor and C/S understand these
points as this is not a technique that can be
      done rotely or robotically. 


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER

                                       as assisted by
                                       Senior C/S Int

                                       Assisted by
                                       Snr C/S Int Assistant

                                       Accepted by the
                                       BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                       of the
                                       CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
                                       OF CALIFORNIA


      BDCS:LRH:MM:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1981
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 




                    

      LIMITED
      DISTRIBUTION
      Advanced Courses
      Specialist
      Checksheet
      ACS Auditors
      ACS C/Ses 
                                  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                   HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JANUARY 1982 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 55

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                                        VARYING THE AREAS 


            Session by session and item by item, when spotting something
to list, it is best to work a different area
      than the last item. 

            This is true when there still seem to be more in the last
area worked. 

            Example: one session, top of head; next session, even though
head is slightly massy although one has
      blown, work, let's say, an area in the back where one is spotted.
Then, that listed, handled and blown, one
      can go back to the head. 

            The operating rule that seems best is not to work the same
area twice in succession. 

            One also must be sure to work behind as well as in front and
from different angles from in front and
      behind. By continuing to work from the front only, on and on,
builds up an imbalance that can increase
      duress. 

            One also must remember to not always work close in: from
time to time check out areas that are as much
      as many feet from the body. 

            When one has worked one, two or three areas, one is likely
to get a persistent F/N, very wide, and that is
      the time to lay off for now, end session and begin again later -
in a few hours or next day. If you keep
      plugging on after a good win, you are actually overrunning a
persistent F/N and it clears up by simply
      indicating that. 

            Forcing forward past a good win can give you a temporary
pack up; so you actually make less progress
      than you would have if you short-sessioned as you are supposed to. 


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER


      LRH:dm:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1978
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
